Contemporary society and Stakeholders the Impact showing how Unilever Deal with Their Connection F

DARE TO EMBRACE VARIATIONS:

LEADERSHIP EXPERTISE FOR UNILEVER

Maarten-van Beek

Manager, Recruitment

Unilever

Postbus 1925, 3000 BX Rotterdam,

The Netherlands

Tel: (31) 6-53419550

E-mail: Maarten-van. [email protected] com

Grachev, Mikhail V.

Affiliate Professor of Management

Traditional western Illinois University or college

3561 60th Street, Moline, Il 61265

USA

Tel (309) 762-9481

Fax (309) 762-6989

Fuzy. This newspaper focuses on leadership competencies in multinational firms. It shows culture-contingent character of successful leadership and reviews the lessons learned via Global Command and Company Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE) analysis that are suitable to the multinational companies. The authors assess Unilever's encounter in building leadership expertise and the results of interviews with firm managers in Russia. The authors discuss culture-specific adjustments to the technique of building management competencies inside the Russian supplementary and sum it up innovative solutions in management development for multinational businesses.

Key words: cross-cultural management, leadership, multinational companies, emerging market segments

Address messages to: Mikhail Grachev, Relate Professor of Management, European Illinois School, 3561 60th Street, Moline, Il 61265, USA; Tel (309) 762-9481; Fax (309) 762-6989; Email-based: [email protected] edu DARE TO EMBRACE VARIATIONS:

LEADERSHIP COMPETENCIES FOR UNILEVER

Abstract. This kind of paper is targeted on leadership expertise in multinational companies. That displays culture-contingent nature of effective leadership and opinions the lessons learned from Global Leadership and Organizational Habit Effectiveness (GLOBE) research which can be applicable for the multinational companies. The experts analyze Unilever's experience in building management competencies plus the results of interviews with company managers in Spain. The authors discuss culture-specific adjustments towards the process of building leadership competencies in the Russian subsidiary and summarize innovative solutions in leadership advancement for multinational companies.

Keywords and phrases: cross-cultural management, leadership, international companies, rising markets DARE TO TAKE HOLD OF DIFFERENCES:

LEADERSHIP COMPETENCIES PERTAINING TO UNILEVER

Launch

Inside the 2000s international companies had been seriously considering behavioral solutions and command competencies particularly, as a source for competitive advantage and sustainable ideal development, although trying to stability global and native perspectives upon effective management behavior. General standards in this field have not recently been developed however, and, taking into consideration the contingent nature of technique and command, probably would not end up being finalized. Yet , intensive hunt for practical alternatives in fascinating, gripping, riveting leadership competencies into company strategies in successful multinationals such as Johnson& Johnson, 3M, or Unilever, demands assumptive interpretation of such initiatives. The study focuses on Unilever, an easy moving international consumer goods company. On the one hand, Unilever features seriously considered behavioural resources for earning in the global markets and developed a competency version, the ‘Leadership for Progress Profile' (LGP), which has been integrated world-wide. Alternatively, Unilever stresses its readiness to operate most effectively in local market segments – being a multi-local multinational company. For this reason , we make an effort to outline the role of cultural differences in the process of building leadership competencies in this global corporation. In the following paragraphs we advise an integrated theoretical framework of effective management in multinational companies, and additional develop this framework by testing that through scientific analysis of leadership competencies at Unilever and at the Russian supplementary. First, we discuss the contextual concerns of powerful leadership tendencies in...

Recommendations: Adler, In.; Doktor, R.; Redding, H. (1986) Through the Atlantic towards the Pacific 100 years: cross-cultural supervision reviewed. Record of Management, 12(2), 296-318.

Arnold, M. & Quelch, J. (1998) New approaches in emerging economies. Sloan Management Assessment, 40, 7-20.

Barney, L. (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Supervision, 17, 99-120.

Barney, J. (1995) Looking inside the competitive advantage. School of Administration Executive, 9, 49-67.

Bartlett, C. & Ghoshal, S i9000. (2002) Building competitive advantage through persons. Sloan Management Review, Winter, 34-41.

Largemouth bass, B. (1981) Stogill's handbook of command. New York: Cost-free Press.

Chakravarthy, B. & Perlmutter, H. (1985) Tactical planning for a global business. Columbia Journal of World Organization, Summer, 3-10.

Donaldson, T. (1996) Ideals in tension: ethics away from home. Harvard Business Review, September-October, 48-56.

Doz, Y. & Prahalad, C. K. (1986) Controlled variety: a challenge to get human resource management in the MNC. Hrm, 25, 55-71.

Dunette, Meters. D. (ed) (1976) Guide of industrial and organisational mindset. Chicago: Flanke McNally School Publishing.

Elenkov, D. (1997) Differences and similarities in managerial principles between US and Russian managers. Washington dc Management Assessment, 40, 133-156.

Engelhard, J. & Nagele, J. (2003) Organizational learning in subsidiaries of multinational companies in Russia. Log of Universe Business, 37, 262-277.

Fey, C. & Beamish, P. (2000) Joint venture conflict: the situation of Russian international joint ventures. Worldwide Business Review, 9, 139-162.

Fey, C. & Bjorkman, I. (2001) The effect of human resource management techniques on MNC subsidiary functionality in Spain. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (1), 59-75.

Fey, C.; Bjorkman, We.; & Pavlovskaya, A. (2000) The effect of human resource management procedures on company performance in Russia. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-18.

Grachev, M. (2001) Taking advantage of cult ural differences. Harvard Business Review, October, 28-30.

Grachev, Meters. (2004) Ethnic attributes of Russian management. Improvements in International Management, 12-15, 159-177.

Prahalad, C. K & Hamel, G. (1990) The key competence in the corporation. Harvard Business Assessment, May-Jun, 79-91.

Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C. E. (1994) Competing for the future. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.

Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture's Consequences. Beverly Slopes: Sage.

Hoskisson, R.; Eden, L.; Lau, C-M.; & Wright, Meters. (2000) Strategy in appearing economies. Senior high of Managing Journal, 43, 249-267.

Property, R. J.; Hanges, G. J.; Javidan, M.; Dorfman, P. T.; & Gupta, V. (eds) (2004) Traditions, leadership, and organizations: the GLOBE study of 62 communities. Thousand Oak trees: Sage Publications.

Hay-McBer (2000) Leadership competency dictionary.

Michailova, S. (2000) Contrasts in culture: Russian and Traditional western perspectives in organizational modify. The School of Supervision Executive, 16 (4), 99-112.

Miles, Meters. & Huberman, A. (1994) Qualitative info analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Journals.

Minbaeva, G.; Pedersen, To.; Bjorkman, We.; Fey, C.; & Playground, H. (2003) MNC knowledge transfer, part absorptive potential, and HRM. Journal of International Organization Studies, 34, 586-599.

Naumov, A. & Puffer, T. (2000) Measuring Russian culture using Hofstede 's sizes. Applied Psychology: An International Assessment, 49 (4), 709-718.

Avoir, M. E. (1990) The competitive good thing about nations. Nyc: Free Press

Ralston, D.; Holt, 3rd there’s r.; Terpstra, L.; & Kai-Cheng, Y

Rogovsky, N. & Schuler, 3rd there’s r. (1997) Taking care of human resources across cultures. Organization and Modern World, IX (1), 63-75.

Rondinelli, Deb. & Dark, S. (2000) Multinational proper alliances and acquisitions in Central and Eastern European countries: partnerships in privatization. Academy of Managing Executive, 14(4), 85-98.

Schein E. L. (1990) Organizational culture and leadership. S . fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schneider, S. (1988) National versus corporate culture: implications to get human resources management. Human Resource Management, 27 (2), 231-246.

Shama A. (1995) Entry tricks of U. S. firms for the newly self-employed states, Baltic Republics, and Eastern Europe. California Administration Review, 37(3), Spring, 90-109.

Shama A. (2000) Determinants of entrance strategies of U. S. firms into Russian federation, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Romania. Thunderbird International Business Review, 42(6), 651-676.

Shekshnia, S. (1998) Western multinationals' human resource techniques in Russia. European Management Journal, 18, 460-465.

Shenkar O. (2004) The function of cultural distance in international expansion. In Trick, M. (ed) Global Corporate and business Evolution: Searching Inward or Looking To the outside? International Administration Series, 5, Carnegie Mellon University Press, 363-371.

Unilever (1998-2005) Corporate and business documentation.

Uzzi, B. (1996) The sources and effects of embeddedness for economic performance of organization: the network result. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674-698.

sobre Vries, M. (2000) A journey in to the " Wild East”: command style and organizational techniques in The ussr. Organizational Characteristics, 28(4), 67-81.

Yukl, G. (1998) Leadership in organisations. Upper Saddle River, NJ-NEW JERSEY: Prentice Lounge.